Daily wire twitter7/10/2023 ![]() A federal appeals court then modified the Texas judge's ruling and imposed new restrictions on the drug while the case was being litigated - including restricting approval to the first seven weeks of pregnancy, down from 10.Ĭomplicating matters, just minutes after the Texas judge published his ruling, a federal judge in Washington issued a contradictory ruling, forbidding the FDA from pulling the medication from the market in 17 states that have Democratic attorneys general.Account icon An icon in the shape of a person's head and shoulders. ![]() "My administration will continue to defend FDA's independent, expert authority to review, approve, and regulate a wide range of prescription drugs."Įarlier in April, a federal judge in Amarillo, Texas, issued a ruling suspending mifepristone's FDA approval, arguing the approval itself was unlawful. "As a result of the Supreme Court's stay, mifepristone remains available and approved for safe and effective use," Biden said in a statement on Friday. On May 17, a 5th circuit judge in New Orleans will hear appeals related to the FDA's scope in regulating the drugs, as well as the SCOTUS decision on Friday, according to CNN.Īfter the decision, President Joe Biden said that his administration would try to protect access to the pill. "A year after, I don't know if the Supreme Court is going to be up for a nationwide ban on the most common way of obtaining an abortion," he said.īut there are still other legal challenges to abortion access moving through lower courts. Scott Lemieux, a professor of political science at the University of Washington and an expert on the Supreme Court and constitutional law, told Insider that the decision was "less troubling" than many were anticipating, but not necessarily indicative of how the justices will rule on the larger matter come oral arguments. Anti-abortion activists and lawmakers have sought to limit access to the drugs, while their opponents - including the Biden administration - have sought to expand access. ![]() While Alito and Clarence Thomas publicly dissented, it's unclear from the ruling which, if any, other justices may have also dissented - only that there was a majority that favored the stay.ĭrugs like mifepristone and misoprostol have been under heightened scrutiny from abortion opponents since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. The sparse ruling came Friday night with no oral arguments or public reasoning from the other eight justices for their decisions. That ruling was set to expire Friday at midnight. ![]() Justice Samuel Alito last Friday issued a temporary stay on lower court rulings that would have greatly restricted access to mifepristone. The issue reached the nation's top court last week after the Biden administration submitted an emergency application to preserve the US Food and Drug Administration's 20-year-old approval of the medication mifepristone, which is used alongside a second drug, misoprostol, to end pregnancies. The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that the abortion pill mifepristone could still be purchased and used in the US, freezing a lower court ruling that temporarily suspended FDA approval of the drug. Account icon An icon in the shape of a person's head and shoulders.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |